Juvenile Law Center filed amicus briefs on behalf of a child soldier accused of war crimes, arguing that the Military Commissions Act was not intended to have jurisdiction over juveniles.
Juvenile Law Center’s brief argues that the mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole imposed on a 16-year-old is a disproportionate punishment under the U.S. and Massachusetts Constitutions.
This brief to the Appellate Court of New Mexico argued that a provision in New Mexico law allowing juveniles to be tried as adults if a judge finds them not amenable to treatment is unconstitutional.
Argued that a juvenile’s 75-year sentence for a crime in which the victims suffered no serious injury is disproportionate and violates state, federal and international law.
Argued that the use of delinquency adjudications to enhance an adult criminal sentence violates US Supreme Court precedent as well as California's commitment to maintaining a separate juvenile justice system.
Argued that a provision in New Mexico state law allowing juveniles to be sentenced by juvenile court judges as adults if the judge found them “not amenable to treatment” was unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment.
Juvenile Law Center challenges the constitutionality of Act 53, a Pennsylvania statute which permits minors to be involuntarily committed for substance abuse treatment.
Juvenile Law Center argued that juvenile court should retain discretion to spare children from permanent stigma associated with lifetime sex offender registration.
Argued that a sentence of 110 years to life (three consecutive life-terms) for a non-homicide offense committed as a juvenile violates the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Graham v. Florida.
Follow: